America at a Crossroads
Executive Summary
Amid rising investor pessimism, this article contends that market fears may be overstated. Inflation remains modest, interest rate cuts are becoming increasingly likely, and tariffs—if applied strategically—have the potential to enhance U.S. production and trade leverage. However, time is of the essence. The U.S. economy stands at a critical crossroads, with outcomes that could swing sharply in either direction. Encouraging consumers to buy American and reviving targeted incentives—such as the 1960s-era negative tax basis—could unlock transformational investment across strategic sectors. With the right policies in place, America is well-positioned for a strong economic rebound. But policy clarity is urgently needed, and a meaningful win on the tariff front would help reset momentum.
--------------
The recent election signaled a clear mandate for change. While the pace and scope of reform have exceeded expectations for some, the results reflect the electorate’s conscious choice. The consequences are now manifesting across multiple dimensions of domestic policy.
Prominent business and political leaders, including Donald Trump and Elon Musk, have demonstrated a willingness to pursue reform despite sustained scrutiny and personal risk. Their persistence, while polarizing, underscores the intensity of the national moment and the urgency of rethinking long-standing economic dependencies.
Market Predictability
Markets reward predictability. When fiscal and monetary policy is transparent and rule-based, risk premiums decline and valuations stabilize. Policy stability, not volatility, is the real engine of long-term investor confidence. In the past week (early April), markets have been punished based on the lack of transparency and predictability. But this does not have to be a long-term situation. Assuming that clarity is restored, preferably sooner rather than later, markets can and will recover. But time is running out…
Tariffs: A Shift in the Economic Narrative
The introduction of sweeping tariffs represents a critical inflection point — one that is generating pronounced uncertainty in financial markets. Investor sentiment has deteriorated sharply, with concern growing around inflationary pressures and the potential for a stagflationary environment reminiscent of the 1970s.
However, current inflation levels remain modest by historical standards, ranging from 2.5% to 3.5%. Unlike past crises, such as the oil embargo of the 1970s, the United States now enjoys a position of energy independence. This foundational difference substantially alters the risk profile of today’s environment. Moreover, the long bond (10 year treasury)-owing to perceptions of increased risk-has dropped in recent days to below 4%. Oil prices are dropping below $60 per barrel. Not everything is inflationary. To the contrary, under normal circumstances these two data points would be extremely bullish for the markets.
While many economists have raised legitimate concerns about the proposed tariffs — particularly their potential impact on global supply chains — few have offered alternative solutions. Most critiques rely heavily on historical precedent. In contrast, the current proposal, while controversial, may serve a strategic function: to reframe national priorities around production, resilience, and investment.
Tariffs: A Tool to Reframe the Narrative
Recent tariff announcements have stirred market unease, partly because of their perceived ad hoc nature. Yet when applied strategically, tariffs can serve as a framework for industrial renewal — particularly if guided by three well-defined objectives:
- Reshore critical industries, such as semiconductors and advanced manufacturing
- Raise revenues to narrow the persistent U.S. trade deficit
- Create leverage to compel trading partners to lower their own tariffs
To achieve these, tariffs should ideally be targeted, proportionate, and negotiated on a country-by-country basis. A one-size-fits-all strategy reduces negotiating flexibility and risks triggering broad-based trade retaliation. This is the case at present. On the other hand, tailored, bilateral agreements allow for greater precision and effectiveness.
The current administration appears to be moving in this direction — and if done thoughtfully, this measured application can both stabilize trade and support diplomatic repositioning. It also provides an opportunity for political leadership to redefine the goals of globalization around mutual benefit, resilience, and reciprocity.
Industrial Policy: Investing Tariff Revenue in the Right Places
If tariff revenues are reinvested with intention, they can form the financial backbone of a modern industrial strategy. Funds should be deployed into areas of national priority: robotics, infrastructure, AI, energy, auto production, and critical supply chains.
Importantly, tariff rates should remain low enough and equally proportionate to preserve trade flows and avoid consumer price shocks — but high enough to signal urgency and shift incentives. The goal is not economic isolation, but recalibration.
Deals with individual nations — structured around fairer terms and shared production objectives — can narrow trade gaps without collapsing global partnerships. A measured, predictable rollout would allow businesses and markets to adjust, and ensure public support is maintained throughout the process.
Beyond the Status Quo: Rebuilding Strategic Autonomy
For decades, both major political parties have deferred substantive structural reform. Public sector employment — particularly in government, healthcare, and social services — has expanded steadily, yet this model does little to enhance long-term national competitiveness. The United States has become increasingly reliant on foreign supply chains for critical goods, including semiconductors, rare earth minerals, and pharmaceuticals.
This dependency poses significant strategic risks. A geopolitical disruption — such as a potential annexation of Taiwan by China — could instantly disrupt access to advanced semiconductors, halting industrial productivity and threatening national security. The imperative to rebuild resilient, domestic supply chains is not ideological; it is pragmatic.
Moreover, it is entirely rational to encourage the consumption of domestically produced goods. U.S. vehicles are competitive on quality, yet face limited uptake in European and Asian markets. Promoting domestic consumption — particularly in sectors where the U.S. maintains technological leadership — is both defensible and economically productive.
Negative Tax Basis: A Catalyst for Investment
To stimulate large-scale capital investment, policymakers should consider a revival of the negative tax basis policy framework — a historically effective mechanism for mobilizing private capital.
Under this model, utilized in the 1960s, investors were permitted to deduct losses exceeding their initial investment during the early years of a project. For example, an investor contributing $1 million could claim $3 million in losses upfront, thereby accelerating their time to breakeven and internal rate of return. This powerful incentive structure catalyzed the growth of several major U.S. industries, including California’s agricultural and tech sectors, and Texas’s cattle and energy infrastructure.
By reinstating this policy with modern safeguards, the U.S. could direct capital toward strategic sectors such as semiconductors, energy, automation, and critical infrastructure. Regional development initiatives could further guide investment to areas poised for long-term expansion or in need of economic revitalization.
Reframing U.S. Economic Strategy
The proposed tariff policy should be seen as a gateway to a more comprehensive national strategy — one focused on restoring and reshoring productive capacity, incentivizing private capital formation, and reducing economic vulnerability. Once trade negotiations stabilize, a targeted set of tariff protections may remain in place. Their deeper function, however, lies in creating the political and narrative space to initiate industrial policy reform.
This reframing has the potential to catalyze one of the most significant capital redeployments in modern U.S. history. It requires long-range planning, bipartisan commitment, and a willingness to depart from the inertia of past decades. But the opportunity is real — and increasingly urgent.
Investor Sentiment and the Path Forward
Despite near-term volatility, pessimism often presents opportunity. Historically, markets have rebounded strongly after periods of public and investor doubt. Should the administration succeed in negotiating favorable trade adjustments and introduce credible investment incentives, the United States could reenter a period of strong, productivity-led growth.
The tools are available. The only remaining question is whether we have the vision — and resolve — to use them.
----------------------------
Disclosure Note: past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please refer to the below disclosures: https://lnkd.in/e29X6rN
Additional Disclosure Note: The author has an affiliation with ERShares and XOVR. The intent of the article is to provide objective information, but as in all equity investments, investors should carefully review investment options with an experienced investment professional prior to making any investment decision. Past performance is no guide or guarantee to future performance.